In last month’s Business Briefs, we discussed the Statute of Frauds, which requires that certain types of contracts must be in writing to be valid and enforceable.
What about an agreement reached solely by email communications? The answer, under California law, can be found in the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, beginning at Civil Code §1633.1 (enacted in 1999).
The good news is that, subject to varied and numerous exceptions, parties who exchange emails indicating that both of them have the intention of forming a contract based dominantly on their respective emails will almost certainly be deemed to have formed a binding and enforceable contract. Here are some of the key components of the ACT:
- An “electronic signature” means an electronic sound, symbol or process attached to or logically associated with an electronic record (such as an email);
- The parties should be explicit. Example of what might be included in an email: “This communication is intended by the parties to be a binding agreement when all parties have intended and agreed to be bound by it”;
- A contract may not be defined legal effect solely because it is in electronic form, or solely because an electronic record was used in its formation;
- If the law requires a contract to be in writing, and/or to be signed by the parties, an electronic record and electronic signature are deemed to legally satisfy that requirement.
The information presented is not intended to be, and does not constitute, “legal advice.” Because each situation varies, and only brief summary information is provided here, you should not use this information as a basis for action unless you have independently verified with your own counsel that it applies to your particular situation.